Some of what you see here is sample content. While the community forms, part of the members, reviews, ratings and discussions are seeded examples. Every one is badged Sample, and they do count towards the totals on this site. Vendor pages, the security data and the tools are real.
Unavoidable if you are a Microsoft shop, and mostly good
3.6/5overall, average of the five axes
Deployment effort3
Support quality3
Features vs promises5
Pricing transparency3
Return on investment4
What happened
Conditional access is powerful and once you understand the evaluation model you can express policy that used to need three products. The licensing tiers are the frustration: several controls a security team considers basic sit behind P2. Documentation is thorough but scattered across renamed products.
Worked well
Conditional access is genuinely powerful. Deep integration with the rest of the estate. Constant feature delivery.
Did not
Important controls sit behind higher tiers. Product renaming makes documentation hard to follow. Complexity grows quickly.
4 found this helpful