Reviews with deployment context, not star-bait.
Every review scores five axes and states who wrote it: organisation size, industry, deployment year, what it replaced, and the reviewer's disclosed affiliation. Vendor employees cannot review. One review per vendor per member.
Latest reviews
Bought for WAF, kept for everything else
We came for DDoS and WAF and ended up moving DNS, Zero Trust access and tunnels there too. The dashboard is fast, the docs are excellent, and changes take effect in seconds rather...
Easier to live with than the enterprise alternative
We wanted PAM without a two-quarter implementation. Secret Server got us vaulting and rotation in weeks rather than months, and the admin experience is much lighter. It does less t...
The serious PAM answer, with a serious implementation
If you need vaulting, session isolation and recording that survives a regulator asking questions, CyberArk is the mature answer. Implementation is a project measured in quarters an...
Content library is the reason to buy it
The library is the differentiator: enough variety that people do not see the same three templates every quarter, and localisation that works for a multi-country business. Reporting...
Caught the invoice fraud attempt everything else missed
We layered Abnormal on top of Microsoft 365 rather than replacing anything, and within the first month it flagged a supplier invoice change that had already passed the gateway. The...
Email security that measurably reduced our incidents
Phishing was our top incident category and it no longer is. The URL rewriting and attachment sandboxing catch things that got through our previous gateway, and the reporting is goo...
Great if you have the engineering to run it
We already ran Elastic for logs so extending into security was a small step and the cost model is much kinder than per-GB SIEMs. Detection rules are open and readable, which our de...
Still the most capable, still the most expensive
Nothing else we tested handles our data volume and query complexity the way Splunk does, and the app ecosystem means most sources are solved problems. The cost is the entire conver...
Quietly excellent detection at a fair price
Consistently strong in independent tests and our own experience matches: very low false positive rate, which for a small team is worth more than headline detection numbers. Console...
Sensible product, excellent for a small team
Central makes a two-person team feel bigger than it is. Policy is comprehensible, the ransomware protection has held up in tests, and the MDR add-on gave us cover overnight without...
Good regional support and honest pricing for our size
We are a 900-endpoint operation in India and the calculus is different: response time from local support matters more to us than a marginally better detection benchmark. Seqrite an...
Reliable workhorse, integration takes effort
Been running Qualys for years across a distributed logistics estate. The scanning is dependable and the agent is light. The modules stack up and getting data out into our own repor...
The scanning standard, priced like the standard
Tenable is what auditors expect to see and the plugin coverage is comprehensive, particularly for OT-adjacent equipment where the alternatives were guessing. It is not cheap and th...
Scanning is fine, the remediation workflow is why we stayed
Every scanner finds vulnerabilities. What we needed was a way to hand IT a list they would actually work through, and the remediation projects plus the goals view did that better t...
The firewall is excellent, the licence stack is the cost
PAN-OS does what we need and App-ID is still the best in class for policy that survives an audit. Budget honestly though: the appliance is a fraction of the total once you add subs...